Currently reading
Jul. 23rd, 2025 03:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
On Wednesday, even!
Almost finished: Ombria in Shadow, Patricia McKillip: This is one of my favorite McKillips and one I reread frequently. I feel like the worldbuilding is more distinctive than some of her other works from this period, maybe because it's set in a decaying city which is vividly sketched in. It also feels a lot more dangerous and high-stakes than some of her later work, at least to me, and I love Mag and Lydea and Faey. I still do not entrely understand what is going on at the end but that certainly is typical of this phase of McKillip's writing.
Midway: Cato the Younger, Fred K. Drogula. I forgot that I owned a copy of this so I was particularly delighted to find it on the shelf. I think it's very good; Drogula does a fine job of maintaining his impartiality while making it perfectly clear what kind of person Cato was, and how much responsiblity he bears for the collapse of the Roman Republic through sheer bloody-minded assholeishness. But he also isn't presenting Cato as a simplistic, moralistic figure: he was also very good at navigating and directing Roman politics in his lifetime, and Drogula also does a good job explaining why the system was perhaps particularly vulnerable to manipulation by men like Cato (or Caesar, his nemesis.)
Almost finished: Ombria in Shadow, Patricia McKillip: This is one of my favorite McKillips and one I reread frequently. I feel like the worldbuilding is more distinctive than some of her other works from this period, maybe because it's set in a decaying city which is vividly sketched in. It also feels a lot more dangerous and high-stakes than some of her later work, at least to me, and I love Mag and Lydea and Faey. I still do not entrely understand what is going on at the end but that certainly is typical of this phase of McKillip's writing.
Midway: Cato the Younger, Fred K. Drogula. I forgot that I owned a copy of this so I was particularly delighted to find it on the shelf. I think it's very good; Drogula does a fine job of maintaining his impartiality while making it perfectly clear what kind of person Cato was, and how much responsiblity he bears for the collapse of the Roman Republic through sheer bloody-minded assholeishness. But he also isn't presenting Cato as a simplistic, moralistic figure: he was also very good at navigating and directing Roman politics in his lifetime, and Drogula also does a good job explaining why the system was perhaps particularly vulnerable to manipulation by men like Cato (or Caesar, his nemesis.)